Ethical Concerns About ChatGPT in Healthcare: A Useful Tool or the Tombstone of Original and Reflective Thinking?

Artificial intelligence (AI), the uprising technology of computer science aiming to create digital systems with human behavior and intelligence, seems to have invaded almost every field of modern life. Launched in November 2022, ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is a textual AI application capable of creating human-like responses characterized by original language and high coherence. Although AI-based language models have demonstrated impressive capabilities in healthcare, ChatGPT has received controversial annotations from the scientific and academic communities. This chatbot already appears to have a massive impact as an educational tool for healthcare professionals and transformative potential for clinical practice and could lead to dramatic changes in scientific research. Nevertheless, rational concerns were raised regarding whether the pre-trained, AI-generated text would be a menace not only for original thinking and new scientific ideas but also for academic and research integrity, as it gets more and more difficult to distinguish its AI origin due to the coherence and fluency of the produced text. This short review aims to summarize the potential applications and the consequential implications of ChatGPT in the three critical pillars of medicine: education, research, and clinical practice. In addition, this paper discusses whether the current use of this chatbot is in compliance with the ethical principles for the safe use of AI in healthcare, as determined by the World Health Organization. Finally, this review highlights the need for an updated ethical framework and the increased vigilance of healthcare stakeholders to harvest the potential benefits and limit the imminent dangers of this new innovative technology.

Hybrid model: a promising type of public procurement in the healthcare sector of the European Union.

The management of health supplies in public hospitals has been a major concern of national and European institutions over time, often being a field of reforms and regulatory interventions. Health procurement systems constitute complex decision-making and supply chain management mechanisms of public hospitals, involving suppliers, health providers, administrators and political bodies. Due to this complexity, the first important decision to be taken when designing a procurement system, concerns the degree of centralization, namely to what extent the decision-making power on the healthcare procurement (what, how and when) will be transferred either to a central public authority established for this purpose, or to the competent local authorities. In this perspective, we attempt to analyse the types of public procurement in the healthcare sector of the European Union, in terms of degree of centralization. Employing a narrative approach that summarizes recent interdisciplinary literature, this perspective finds that the healthcare procurement systems of the EU Member States, based on the degree of centralization, are categorized into three types of organizational structures: Centralized, Decentralized and Hybrid procurement. Each structure offers advantages and disadvantages for health systems. According to this perspective, a combination of centralized and decentralized purchases of medical supplies represents a promising hybrid model of healthcare procurement organization by bringing the benefits of two methods together.

The Greek Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical Student Version (JSE-S): Psychometric Properties and Its Associated Factors.

The present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Student version (JSE-S) and its association with potential predictors among Greek-speaking undergraduate medical students. This study adopted a cross-sectional, comparative-descriptive research design. The study was conducted during October and November 2023. Cronbach's α values for the JSE-S and the factors "perspective taking", "compassionate care", and "standing in the patient's shoes" showed internal consistency. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the JSE-S score in the test-retest study indicated a high level of reliability. The participants showed moderate empathy levels. Females scored higher than males in the Greek version of the JSE-S. Moreover, students enrolled in the fourth academic year showed higher empathy mean scores than those enrolled in the first year. Statistically significant empathy differences by specialty preferences or faith in God/supreme power were not found. The present study provided satisfactory evidence that the Greek JSE-S is a psychometrically sound measurement instrument. Empathy differences by gender were found in line with prior literature.

Perceptions and experiences of fertility preservation in female patients with cancer in Greece.

BACKGROUND: As advances in oncology have led to remarkable and steady improvements in the survival rates of patients with cancer and anticancer treatment can cause premature ovarian failure in women, fertility preservation (FP) has become a global public health concern and an integral part of the care for women diagnosed with cancer during reproductive age. However, for various reasons, FP remains underutilized for patients with cancer. There are substantial gaps in our knowledge about women's experiences and perceptions of the issue. This study aims to contribute to bridging that gap. METHODS: This prospective qualitative study was conducted from March 2018 to February 2023. A combination of purposive and snowball sampling was used. Data were collected by semistructured interviews with nineteen reproductive-age women who had been recently diagnosed with cancer. Data were classified and analysed with a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: A variety of distinct themes and subthemes emerged from the analysis of the interview data. The cancer diagnosis emerged as a factor that considerably affects the women's attitudes towards biological parenthood: It can further increase their (strong) previous desire or decrease their previous (weak) desire. Women with a recent cancer diagnosis had not received adequate and multidisciplinary counselling, including clear and sufficient information. However, participants felt satisfied with the information they received because they either received the information they requested or remained in denial about the need to be informed (i.e., because they felt overwhelmed after the cancer diagnosis). Embryo cryopreservation emerged as a less desirable FP option for women with cancer. Participants showed respect for human embryos, not always for religious reasons. Surrogacy emerged as the last resort for most participants. Religious, social or financial factors did play a secondary (if any) role in women's decision-making about FP. Finally, male partners' opinions played a secondary role in most participants' decision-making about FP. If embryo cryopreservation was the selected option, partners would have a say because they were contributing their genetic material. CONCLUSIONS: The findings that emerged from the data analysis were partly consistent with prior studies. However, we identified some interesting nuances that are of clinical importance. The results of this study may serve as a starting point for future research.

Ethical considerations surrounding health-related big data research.

As health-related big data research (HRBDR) has drastically increased over the last years due to the rapid development of big data analytics, a range of important ethical issues are raised. In this study, a systematic literature review was conducted. Several and interesting results emerged from this review. The term ″big data″ has not yet been clearly defined. The already existing ethical principles and concepts need to be revisited in the new HRBDR context. Traditional research ethics notions like privacy and informed consent are to be reconsidered. HRBDR creates new ethical issues such those related to trust / trustworthiness and public values such as reciprocity, transparency, inclusivity and common good. The implementation of dynamic consent rather than broad consent is currently highlighted as the more satisfying solution. Ethical review committees in their current form are ill-suited to provide exclusive ethical oversight on HRBDR projects. Expanding Ethical Review Committees' purview and members' expertise, as well as creating novel oversight bodies by promoting a co-governance system including public and all the stakeholders involved are strongly recommended. The mechanism of ″social licence″, that is, informal permissions granted to researchers by society, can serve as a guideline. High-stakes decisions are often made under uncertainty. Machine learning algorithms are highly complex and in some cases opaque, and may yield biased decisions or discrimination. Improved interdisciplinary dialogue along with considering aspects like auditing, benchmarking, confidence / trust and explainability /interpretability may address concerns about HRBDR ethics. Finally and most importantly, research ethics shifts towards a population-based model of ethics.

Perceptions and experiences of female nurses when confronted with expressing a conscientious objection towards end-of-life care in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Conscientious objection in nursing has been a topic of much discussion in recent years. Healthcare providers' conscientious objection has been included in Greek legislation. However, little is known about the real experiences of nurses who want to apply conscientious objections in their practice. This study aimed to contribute to filling that gap. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted with eighteen experienced female nurses. Data were collected through semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews conducted with purposively selected nurses during the period from October 2019 to January 2020. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. The ethical principles of anonymity, voluntary participation and confidentiality were considered. RESULTS: Eight major themes and seven subthemes emerged from the thematic data analysis. Oppressive behaviors in the workplace and subservient interactions between nurses and physicians, suboptimal communication and inadequate support of nurses, perceived ineffectiveness of nurses' conscientious objections, missing legal protection against job insecurity, provision of care labeled 'futile', nurses' false knowledge and perceptions on medical situations related to conscientious objections, nurses' fears of isolation bullying and negative gossip in the workplace and a trivial amount of nurses' involvement in medical decisions emerged as barriers to nurses raising conscientious objection. Furthermore, from data analysis, it emerged that some nurses had false knowledge and perceptions on medical situations related to conscientious objections, some nurses experienced mild uncertainty distress about their ethical concerns, nurses considered their remote contribution as participation that can give rise to conscientious objection, a collective conscientious objection raised by nurses might have increased chances of being effective, and upbringing, childhood experiences, education and religion are factors shaping the nurses' core values. CONCLUSION: A total of fifteen themes and subthemes emerged from this study. Most of the findings of this study were previously unknown or undervalued and might be helpful to inform nurses and nursing managers or leaders as well as healthcare policy makers. The results of this study might contribute to addressing the need for creating ethically sensitive health care services and ensuring nurses' moral integrity and high quality of patient care.

Transgender Attitudes and Beliefs Scale-Greek (TABS-Gr) version: translation and initial evaluation of psychometric properties among medical students.

BACKGROUND: Transgender people face significantly greater discrimination and health disparities in health care settings than cisgender people. The role of education in eliminating this phenomenon has been increasingly recognized by many medical schools. However, transgender health content is sparse or lacking in the medical curricula of many countries. METHOD: This study was designed to validate the Greek version of the Transgender Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (TABS-Gr). The study adopted a cross-sectional, comparative-descriptive research design. Participants (N = 203) were contacted through online recruitment and invited to complete an anonymous web-based survey. The data were collected between December 2022 and February 2023. RESULTS: The overall reliability of the TABS-Gr questionnaire was high (Cronbach's α = 0.961, p. from Hotelling's T-squared test < 0.000). High Cronbach's alpha values were estimated for the three subscales, with α = 0.958 for Interpersonal Comfort, α = 0.906 for Gender Beliefs, and α = 0.952 for Human Values. Hotelling's T-squared test confirmed that all items on the scale had the same mean (p < 0.001 for all subgroups). Explanatory factor analysis (EFA) demonstrated adequate fit. Convergent and discriminant validity were validated based on the estimated correlations. The three-factor structure of the Greek TABS version was confirmed. The mean total score was 155.95 (SD = 30.63), indicating that medical students had a moderately positive attitude towards transgender people. Participants showed significantly less biased (more tolerant, positive) attitudes towards transgender people on the Interpersonal Comfort (IC) and Human Value (HV) subscales than on the Sex/Gender Beliefs (SGB) subscale. A demographic comparison was conducted and demonstrated a correlation between scores and sociodemographics, except for place of origin. A statistically significant increase in the total mean score was estimated for women compared to men. CONCLUSION: The overall psychometric findings provide some evidence to support the validity of the Greek version of the TABS. However, we call for further validation research in Greek medical schools. Since our claims for validity are based in part on an exploratory factor analysis, a future confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is part of our call for further validation research. While the results of this study are mostly in line with the results of previous research, some nuances were identified. These results may inform educators, medical school curricula and education policy-makers.

Ageism among dentists who are Facebook users in Greece.

The phenomenon of ageism in healthcare is a significant threat to elderly people's well-being. There is a literature gap regarding the topic of ageism among dental professionals in Greece. This study aims to contribute to filling this gap. A cross-sectional study was conducted using recently validated in Greece 15-item ageism 6-point Likert-scale. The scale has been previously validated in the environment of senior dental students. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. A total of 365 dentists responded to the questionnaire. As to the internal consistency of the scale, Cronbach's alpha found to be very low (α = 0.590) to support the reliability of a total of 15 Likert-type questions (items) of the scale. However, the factor analysis resulted in three factors that achieved high reliability towards validity. The demographic comparison with these factors and single items revealed statistically significant gender differences in ageism (with males being more ageist than females), and differences related to other socio-demographic factors, which however, were related to factors or items individually. The study revealed that the Greek version of the ageism scale for dental students had not further validity and reliability among dentists. However, some items were distributed into three factors that presented significant validity and reliability. This is of great importance for the ongoing research on the topic ″ageism in dental healthcare″.

Ageism among dentists who are Facebook users in Greece / Edadismo entre los dentistas que utilizan Facebook en Grecia

The phenomenon of ageism in healthcare is a significant threat to elderly people’s well-being. Thereis a literature gap regarding the topic of ageism among dental professionals in Greece. This study aimsto contribute to filling this gap. A cross-sectional study was conducted using recently validated in Greece15-item ageism 6-point Likert-scale. The scale has been previously validated in the environment of seniordental students. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. A total of 365 dentists responded tothe questionnaire. As to the internal consistency of the scale, Cronbach’s alpha found to be very low (α =0.590) to support the reliability of a total of 15 Likert-type questions (items) of the scale. However, the fac-tor analysis resulted in three factors that achieved high reliability towards validity. The demographic com-parison with these factors and single items revealed statistically significant gender differences in ageism(with males being more ageist than females), and differences related to other socio-demographic factors,which however, were related to factors or items individually. The study revealed that the Greek version ofthe ageism scale for dental students had not further validity and reliability among dentists. However, someitems were distributed into three factors that presented significant validity and reliability. This is of greatimportance for the ongoing research on the topic “ageism in dental healthcare”.(AU)

El fenómeno de edadismo en la asistencia sanitaria supone una seria amenaza para el bienestar de laspersonas mayores. Existe un vacío respecto a la literatura sobre la cuestión de edadismo entre los profesio-nales de la odontología en Grecia. El presente estudio pretende colaborar a llenar dicho vacío. Se llevó acabo un estudio transversal mediante una escala de Likert, recientemente validada en Grecia, con 6 puntosy 15 ítems relacionados con el edadismo. La escala se validó previamente en el entorno de los estudiantesde último año de Odontología. La selección de los participantes se realizó a partir de un muestreo inten-cional. Respondieron al cuestionario un total de 365 dentistas. En cuanto a la consistencia interna de laescala, el alfa de Cronbach resultó ser demasiado bajo (α = 0,590) para respaldar la fiabilidad del total de15 preguntas (ítems) tipo Likert de la escala. Sin embargo, el análisis factorial dio lugar a tres factores quealcanzaron una fiabilidad alta en términos de validez. La comparación demográfica con estos factores ycon los ítems individuales reveló diferencias de género estadísticamente significativas en el edadismo—loshombres discriminan por razón de edad más que las mujeres—, mientras que las diferencias relacionadascon otros factores sociodemográficos estaban relacionadas con factores o ítems individuales. El estudioreveló que la versión griega de la escala de edadismo para estudiantes de Odontología no tenía validez niera fiable entre los dentistas. Sin embargo, algunos ítems se distribuyeron en tres factores que presentaronuna validez y una fiabilidad significativas. Esto es de gran importancia para la investigación en curso sobreel tema «Edadismo en la salud bucodental».(AU)

Moral distress among neonatologists working in neonatal intensive care units in Greece: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Working as a neonatologist in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is stressful and involves ethically challenging situations. These situations may cause neonatologists to experience high levels of moral distress, especially in the context of caring for extremely premature infants (EPIs). In Greece, moral distress among neonatologists working in NICUs remains understudied and warrants further exploration. METHODS: This prospective qualitative study was conducted from March to August 2022. A combination of purposive and snowball sampling was used and data were collected by semi-structured interviews with twenty neonatologists. Data were classified and analyzed by thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: A variety of distinct themes and subthemes emerged from the analysis of the interview data. Neonatologists face moral uncertainty. Furthermore, they prioritize their traditional (Hippocratic) role as healers. Importantly, neonatologists seek third-party support for their decisions to reduce their decision uncertainty. In addition, based on the analysis of the interview data, multiple predisposing factors that foster and facilitate neonatologists' moral distress emerged, as did multiple predisposing factors that are sometimes associated with neonatologists' constraint distress and sometimes associated with their uncertainty distress. The predisposing factors that foster and facilitate neonatologists' moral distress thus identified include the lack of previous experience on the part of neonatologists, the lack of clear and adequate clinical practice guidelines/recommendations/protocols, the scarcity of health care resources, the fact that in the context of neonatology, the infant's best interest and quality of life are difficult to identify, and the need to make decisions in a short time frame. NICU directors, neonatologists' colleagues working in the same NICU and parental wishes and attitudes were identified as predisposing factors that are sometimes associated with neonatologists' constraint distress and sometimes associated with their uncertainty distress. Ultimately, neonatologists become more resistant to moral distress over time. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that neonatologists' moral distress should be conceptualized in the broad sense of the term and is closely associated with multiple predisposing factors. Such distress is greatly affected by interpersonal relationships. A variety of distinct themes and subthemes were identified, which, for the most part, were consistent with the findings of previous research. However, we identified some nuances that are of practical importance. The results of this study may serve as a starting point for future research.

Emerging trends in domestic homicide/femicide in Greece over the period 2010-2021.

Temporal trends in epidemiological parameters of domestic homicide and femicide in Greece over the last decade have not yet been studied. We conducted this study to fulfill this purpose. Specifically, we conducted a retrospective epidemiological study using 11-year data from the official nationwide Hellenic Police Archives and statistically analyzed data regarding domestic homicide and femicide. Overall, 1370 records of homicides among which 236 domestic homicides were identified. The pattern emerging from the statistical results of the present study highlighted the phenomenon of femicide as the gravest current issue to be interpreted and addressed. Nationally, the average number of homicides was 114.2/year, among which 19.7 domestic homicides. However, in 2021, while a decrease was recorded in homicides in general to 89 incidents per year, domestic homicides skyrocketed to 34 cases, reaching the highest annual number ever nationally recorded. On average, domestic homicides account for 18.2% of all homicides in Greece. In 2021, however, this percentage rose to 38.2%. The number of male victims of domestic homicide has declined over the years, with a further decline in 2021, in stark contrast to the number of women escalating over time and even more sharply in 2021. The proportion of female victims of domestic homicides in Greece was fourfold higher on average. The fact that cases of domestic homicide and femicide have received a lot of media attention, the recent Greek financial crisis, as well as increased alcohol and drug consumption due to the COVID-19 pandemic constitute possible aggravating factors.

A qualitative study of nursing practitioners' experiences with COVID-19 patients dying alone in Greece.

Background: In Greece, there is still limited research on death in isolation due to COVID-19. This deserves attention because of the recent financial crisis, which profoundly impacted public health, and the high relevance of the Hippocratic tradition to the moral values of clinical practice. Methods: A prospective qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 15 frontline nursing practitioners working in a COVID-19 ward or intensive care unit (ICU) was conducted from July 2021 to December 2021. Results: The inability of family members to say a final goodbye before, during, or after death by performing proper mourning rituals is extremely inhuman and profoundly impacts the mental health status of patients, family members, and nursing practitioners. Patients and their family members strongly desire to see each other. Epidemiology, liability, and proper nursing performance emerged as reasons for the enforced strict visitation restrictions. Participants emphasized that visitations should be allowed on an individual basis and highlighted the need for the effective use of remote communication technology, which, however, does not substitute for in-person contact. Importantly, physicians allowed "clandestine" visits on an individual basis. Nursing practitioners had a strong empathic attitude toward both patients and their families, and a strong willingness to provide holistic care and pay respect to dead bodies. However, they also experienced moral distress. Witnessing heartbreaking scenes with patients and/or their families causes nursing practitioners to experience intense psychological distress, which affects their family life rather than nursing performance. Ultimately, there was a shift from a patient-centered care model to a population-centered care model. Furthermore, we identified a range of policy- and culture-related factors that exaggerate the negative consequences of dying alone of COVID-19. Conclusion: These results reinforce the existing literature on several fronts. However, we identified some nuances related to political decisions and, most importantly, convictions that are deeply rooted in Greek culture. These findings are of great importance in planning tailored interventions to mitigate the problem of interest and have implications for other similar national contexts.

Epidemiology of HIV-associated peripheral neuropathy in people living with human immunodeficiency virus infection in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral neuropathy is among the most common complications among people with HIV with prevalence rates varying widely among studies (10-58%). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the prevalence of HIV-associated peripheral neuropathy among HIV-positive people in Northern Greece monitored during the last 5-year period and investigate possible correlations with antiretroviral therapy, disease staging, and potential risk factors, as there is no prior epidemiological record in Greek patients. METHODS: Four hundred twenty patients were divided into a group with peripheral neuropathy (n = 269), and those without (n = 151). Peripheral neuropathy was assessed with a validated Peripheral Neuropathy Screening tool. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS, were two-tailed, and p-value was set at 0.05. RESULTS: The incidence of peripheral neuropathy was estimated at 35.9%. Age was found to correlate with higher odds of developing HIV-peripheral neuropathy, rising by 4%/year. Females encountered 77% higher probability to develop peripheral neuropathy. Stage 3 of the disease associated with higher occurrence of peripheral neuropathy (96% as compared to stage-1 patients). Among patients with peripheral neuropathy, the duration of antiretroviral therapy was found to be longer than in those without. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral neuropathy remains one of the most common complications regardless of the antiretroviral-therapy type, indicating the involvement of other risk factors in its occurrence, such as the stage of the disease, age and gender. Therefore, the treating physician should screen patients as early and frequently as possible upon HIV-diagnosis to prevent the progression of this debilitating condition so that prolonged life-expectancy is accompanied by a good quality of life.

The phenomenon of overkill in northern Greece: A descriptive forensic psychiatric study between 2015 and 2020 on criminal offenders found not guilty by reason of insanity.

The purpose of this descriptive study was to investigate overkill in a representative sample of Greek psychiatric patients found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRIs) from a forensic psychiatric - criminological standpoint and explore possible correlations of the phenomenon with socio-cultural or psychiatric factors. Overall, 24 forensic psychiatric records of overkill offenders were identified throughout the 5-year records of the national forensic psychiatric service in northern Greek mainland. The pattern that has emerged from the statistical results of the present study on the victims of overkill within the Greek borders was generally in line with global literature on homicide perpetrators. The mean age of overkill offenders (at the time of enactment of the crime) was estimated at 36.3 years ranging from 19 to 55 years (variance = 146.72; standard deviation = 12.11). The number of male single-offence killers was ten-times larger compared to their female counterparts, while the number of male multiple-offence killers were three-times larger compared to their female counterparts. Male offenders were averagely 15 years younger (mean 33.7; variance = 81.69; standard deviation = 9) in comparison to female offenders, and single-offence killers were averagely ten years younger compared to multiple-offence killers (mean 40.2; variance = 185.19; standard deviation = 13.6). The phenomenon correlated more strongly with homicides in the context of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (80-100%) as well as domestic violence. Overall, males outnumbered females both as offenders (approximately five-times) and victims (approximately three-times), but regarding domestic violence, the sad majority of overkill victims stood for females murdered by their male relatives. Close female relatives (especially mothers and grandmothers) were most often victimized. Female-perpetrated overkill was directed against male individuals with whom offenders shared a relationship (intimate partners and minors). An important finding was the fact that three-quarters of the overall perpetrator sample were under prescribed medication at the time of offence, but with a very low compliance rate (5.6%). This last particular finding of the present study demonstrated that mental health services within community in Greece may unfortunately have been ineffective in addressing issues requiring risk assessment and timely intervention.

Reliability of Greek version of the Toronto empathy questionnaire in medical students and associations with sociodemographic and lifestyle factors.

BACKGROUND: Empathy is an important key driver of any therapeutic relationship. It is beneficial for both physicians and patients. Enhancing physician's empathy should be an important goal of medical education. As there was a literature gap regarding the topic of empathy among medical students in Greece, this study aimed to contribute to filling this gap. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. A socio-demographic questionnaire and the 52-item Greek version of the Toronto composite empathy scale (TCES) for measuring the cognitive and emotional aspects of empathy in both personal and professional life was administered to all the medical students in the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, in Greece. Descriptive statistics were displayed for demographics. The associations of the variables were quantified by Chi-2 independence tests and Pearson's Correlation Coefficient. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire was determined by Cronbach's α, Hotelling's T-Squared Test, and Pearson correlation. Paired and Independent Sample T-Tests and One-way ANOVAs indicated statistically significant mean differences among the variables or subgroups of the variables. RESULTS: The 52-item TCES, 26 for the personal (Per) setting and another 26 for professional (Pro) life, equally divided into cognitive (Cog) and emotional (Emo) empathy in each case. The overall reliability of the TCES questionnaire was found to be high (Cronbach's α = 0.895, significant positive correlations between the subscales). The mean total score of empathy showed that students had a moderately high empathy. Further, there was a statistically significant difference in means between the Per-Cog and Per-Emo settings (p < 0.001), the Pro-Cog and Pro-Emo (p < 0.001), the Per-Cog and Pro-Cog (p = 0.004), and the Per-Emo and Pro-Emo (p < 0.001). Females had significantly higher empathy scores (mean score 208.04) than males (192.5) on the Per-Cog, Per-Emo and Pro-Emo subscales. Furthermore, a positive correlation was found between empathy and factors such as love for animals, interest in medical ethics, belief in God, having an ill person in the family, class year or carrier intention. CONCLUSIONS: The TCES is applicable to medical students. For the most part our findings were consistent with previous literature. However, we identified some nuances that might draw researchers' attention. The results of this study may contribute to plan interventions in the curriculum to enhance empathy in the medical students.

The medical futility experience of nursing professionals in Greece.

BACKGROUND: Providing futile medical care is an ever-timely ethical problem in clinical practice. While nursing personnel are very closely involved in providing direct care to patients nearing the end of life, their role in end-of-life decision-making remains unclear. METHODS: This was a prospective qualitative study conducted with experienced nursing professionals from December 2020 through May 2021. Individual in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with sixteen participants. We performed a thematic analysis of the data. RESULTS: Importantly, many participants were half-hearted in their attitude towards accepting or defining futile medical care. Furthermore, interestingly, a list of well-described circumstances emerged, under which the dying process is most likely to be a "bad and undignified" process. These circumstances reflected situations revolving around a) pain and suffering, b) treating patients with respect, c) the appearance and image of the patient body, and d) the interaction between patients and their relatives. Fear of legal action, the lack of a regulatory framework, physicians being pressured by (mostly uninformed) family members and physicians' personal motives were reported as important reasons behind providing futile medical care. The nursing professional's role as a participant in decisions on futile care and as a mediator between physicians and patients (and family members) was highlighted. Furthermore, the patient's role in decisions on futile care was prioritized. The patient's effort to keep themselves alive was also highlighted. This effort impacts nursing professionals' willingness to provide care. Providing futile care is a major factor that negatively affects nursing professionals' inner attitude towards performing their duties. Finally, the psychological benefits of providing futile medical care were highlighted, and the importance of the lack of adequately developed end-of-life care facilities in Greece was emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: These findings enforce our opinion that futile medical care should be conceptualized in the strict sense of the term, namely, as caring for a brain-dead individual or a patient in a medical condition whose continuation would most likely go against the patient's presumed preference (strictly understood). Our findings were consistent with prior literature. However, we identified some issues that are of clinical importance.

The ethics of health-promoting nudges / La ética de los impulsos (“nudges”) que promueven la salud

El objetivo del documento es proporcionar una descripción general del conocimiento actual relaciona-do con la ética de los impulsos (literalmente empujar suavemente, (“nudges”, en inglés) que promuevenla salud. Se realiza un análisis narrativo completo de las publicaciones sobre este tema con el objetivo decontribuir a su debate actual. Es difícil determinar si la autonomía de quien decide puede verse afectadapor la incitaciónes particulares (nudges) o no, ya que la línea de distinción entre las formas cognitivas delrazonamiento humano y las formas automáticas de este — es decir, las emociones— permanece borrosay los diversos tipos de “impulsos” recaen sobre una combinación de dos continuos: uno que va de trans-parente a no transparente y el otro que va de reflectante a automático. Por lo tanto, es probable que lamayoría de los “empujones” funcionen como influencias no argumentativas que eluden la razón y modifi-can, así, la autonomía de quien decide. Hay que aceptar que estos “impulsos o incitaciones” producen unaalteración de la autonomía (individualista) en un grado proporcional al beneficio incontestable previstopara el paciente. Es posible que el interés del paciente no sea claro o que la incitación promueva másel interés de un tercero (no el de quien decide) o, incluso, el bien común. La ética del impulso no siempreestá más allá de toda duda razonable. En tales casos, la parcialidad debe ser lo más mínima posible (esdecir, limitarse a empujones o incitaciones transparentes o casi transparentes y que funcionen de manerareflexiva o casi reflexiva). Estas incitaciones o “empujoncitos” pueden usarse por ejemplo contra la pande-mia de la COVID-19.(AU)

The paper aims to provide an overview of current knowledge related to the ethicality of health-pro-moting nudges and a further elaboration, particularly in terms of linking the interpretation of the findingsof the study and the conclusions adopted. A comprehensive narrative review of literature on the topic ofinterest was undertaken, aiming to contribute to the current debate on the topic of interest. It is practicallyhard to determine whether or not the nudgee’s agency will be eroded by the particular nudge becausethe line of distinction between emotions or automatic ways of human reasoning and cognitive ways of hu-man reasoning remains blurry, and the various types of nudges fall on a combination of two continuums:the one ranging from transparent to non-transparent and the other ranging from reflective to automatic.Therefore, the majority of nudges are most likely to work as reason-bypassing nonargumentative influ-ences, thus eroding the nudgee’s agency. It is time to accept a deviation from the strict commitment to theprinciple of (individualistic) autonomy in degrees proportional to the incontestably anticipated patient’s benefit. In case that patient’s best interest is less than clear or the nudging promotes another individual’sbest interest (not the decider’s one), or even the common good, the ethicality of nudging is not always be-yond reasonable doubt. In such cases the deviation should be as minimal as possible (i.e. limited to nudgesthat are transparent or almost transparent and work reflectively or almost reflectively). Nudging may beused against the COVID-19 pandemic.(AU)

The ethics of health-promoting nudges.

The paper aims to provide an overview of current knowledge related to the ethicality of health-promoting nudges and a further elaboration, particularly in terms of linking the interpretation of the findings of the study and the conclusions adopted. A comprehensive narrative review of literature on the topic of interest was undertaken, aiming to contribute to the current debate on the topic of interest. It is practically hard to determine whether or not the nudgee's agency will be eroded by the particular nudge because the line of distinction between emotions or automatic ways of human reasoning and cognitive ways of human reasoning remains blurry, and the various types of nudges fall on a combination of two continuums: the one ranging from transparent to non-transparent and the other ranging from reflective to automatic. Therefore, the majority of nudges are most likely to work as reason-bypassing nonargumentative influences, thus eroding the nudgee's agency. It is time to accept a deviation from the strict commitment to the principle of (individualistic) autonomy in degrees proportional to the incontestably anticipated patient's benefit. In case that patient's best interest is less than clear or the nudging promotes another individual's best interest (not the decider's one), or even the common good, the ethicality of nudging is not always beyond reasonable doubt. In such cases the deviation should be as minimal as possible (i.e. limited to nudges that are transparent or almost transparent and work reflectively or almost reflectively). Nudging may be used against the COVID-19 pandemic.

Translation and validation of the greek version of a questionnaire measuring patient views on participation in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of clinical research opportunities requires increasing numbers of participants in clinical trials. However, it may become increasingly problematic, as protocols have become increasingly complex. Better understanding of patients' attitudes towards their potential participation in clinical trials is essential for developing effective clinical trial recruitment strategies. In Greece, limited research has been conducted on this topic so far. This study aims to contribute to filling this gap. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. Purposive sampling was used to select participants. The Greek version of a recently developed questionnaire measuring patient views on participation in clinical trials, a 27-item scale distributed into four factors, was tested. In addition, participants were asked to provide information regarding their socio-demographics. A demographic comparison was conducted. RESULTS: The four-factor solution derived in our study consisted of the same 27 items and it was different from the six-factor solution that Arnetz et al. proposed. The factors risks and benefits, that consisted of 5 and 3 items respectively in the six-factor solution, were merged into one factor that consisted of 10 items in the four-factor solution. The four factors produced were Risks and benefits (ten items, α = 0,867), Patient's expectations (six items, α = 0.864), Patient's participation (five items, α = 0.827), and Cost and convenience (five items, α = 0,770). We found that demographic factors did not impact patients' opinions about clinical trials participation, except for gender. The participants reported as important for participating in clinical trial: receiving clear and adequate information (95,5 %) and being given the opportunity to ask questions (97,8 %), take part in discussions regarding their own treatment (94,6 %), and voice their concerns and opinions (91,1 %). As factors strongly associated with participants' willingness to participate in a clinical trial were reported: concerns about the risks of being in a clinical trial (87,5 %), the possible side effects of clinical trials (86,3 %), the type of treatment given in a clinical trial (83,7 %), and whether participation would improve their quality of life (QoL) (81,5 %). CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary validation of the Greek version of the questionnaire measuring patient perceptions and expectations of participating in clinical trials demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability and could be further tested in larger samples. The findings that emerged from this study are in line with previous literature.

Fertility treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to challenges in fertility preservation practices and has led to ethical issues, especially in developing countries. This paper provides a systematic review on this topic. At the beginning of the pandemic, several countries issued directions to suspend fertility treatments except among cancer patients. However, fertility preservation practices resumed gradually. The pandemic has evoked three major issues. First, many voices call for treating infertility as an essential medical condition in individual cases. There is no or negligible risk of transmission of COVID-19 through fertility treatment procedures or pregnancy. Second, there are weaknesses in health systems, especially in African countries. Third, there is enhanced discrimination and, in particular, a need to seriously consider inequality and social stratification in Africa. Oncofertility practices may be unevenly provided. The use of telemedicine to reduce nonessential contacts and the role of the Oncofertility Consortium in developing countries are highlighted.